Generative AI Policy

Pluralia: Journal of Religion and Society recognizes that generative artificial intelligence tools may be used to support academic writing, language editing, literature organization, and technical assistance. However, the use of generative AI must be transparent, ethical, and responsible.

Use of Generative AI by Authors

• Generative AI tools may be used for language editing, grammar improvement, formatting assistance, or preliminary idea organization.
• Generative AI tools must not be listed as authors or co-authors.
• Authors remain fully responsible for the accuracy, originality, validity, and integrity of the manuscript.
• Authors must verify all AI-assisted content, including references, quotations, data interpretation, and factual claims.
• Authors must disclose the use of generative AI tools when such tools substantially contribute to the writing or development of the manuscript.

Prohibited Uses

• Generating fabricated data, interviews, quotations, or references
• Using AI-generated content without verification
• Using AI tools to manipulate images, data, or research findings deceptively
• Submitting AI-generated manuscripts without substantial human authorship and scholarly accountability

Use of Generative AI by Reviewers and Editors

Reviewers and editors must not upload confidential manuscripts, review reports, or unpublished research materials into generative AI tools without permission from the journal. Manuscripts under review must be treated as confidential documents.

Disclosure Statement

When applicable, authors should include a disclosure statement in the manuscript, for example: “The author(s) used generative AI tools for language editing. The author(s) reviewed and verified all content and remain fully responsible for the final manuscript.”